Litigating Traumatic Brain Injuries in Medical Negligence Cases
Written by: Tommy Hastings | Reviewed by: Brady D. Williams | Updated: May 6, 2026
This article is drawn from attorney Tommy Hastings’ presentation, “Understanding and Litigating Traumatic Brain Injuries: Plaintiff’s Perspective,” delivered at the State Bar of Texas Advanced Medical Torts 2026 conference. It offers an accessible overview of what traumatic brain injury is, how it happens in medical settings, and how modern science has changed the way these injuries are diagnosed and proven.

Download Supplemental Research and Resources for this Article
Traumatic Brain Injury in Healthcare: What Patients and Families Need to Know
Every year, tens of thousands of Americans die from traumatic brain injury, and hundreds of thousands more are hospitalized. According to the CDC, falls account for nearly half of all TBI-related hospitalizations, many of which occur in healthcare settings where they could have been prevented. Despite growing awareness, TBI remains one of the most misunderstood injuries in medicine and in the legal system.
What Happens to the Brain During a TBI
Traumatic brain injury is not a single event. It unfolds in two phases. The primary injury occurs at the moment of impact, when mechanical forces cause damage to brain tissue. The brain, floating in cerebrospinal fluid inside the skull, can strike the skull at the point of impact and then rebound to hit the opposite side. This is known as a coup-contrecoup injury. Direct impact can also cause contusions, torn blood vessels leading to hemorrhage, and diffuse axonal injury, where the shearing forces of impact stretch and tear the nerve fibers that connect different regions of the brain.
Diffuse axonal injury is particularly significant because it is the most common pathology in TBI and the primary cause of persistent symptoms, yet it is frequently invisible on conventional imaging like CT scans.
The second phase, known as secondary injury, is a cascade of biochemical processes that can cause additional damage over hours to days following the initial trauma. These processes include neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, brain swelling, and progressive degeneration of damaged nerve fibers. Secondary injury explains why some patients appear fine immediately after a head injury but develop worsening symptoms in the days that follow. It also means that timely medical intervention can potentially prevent or reduce additional brain damage.
Why “Mild TBI” Is Misleading
The term “mild traumatic brain injury” is a medical classification that describes what doctors observe in the first 24 hours after injury. It does not describe what the patient will experience going forward. To a jury or a family member, the word “mild” suggests something minor. For many patients living with persistent cognitive problems, personality changes, and an inability to return to work, there is nothing mild about their injury.
The data supports this. The TRACK-TBI study found that more than 50% of patients who presented with mild TBI and normal CT scans showed evidence of dysfunction six months later. The CENTER-TBI study reported that 38% of CT-negative mild TBI patients had incomplete recovery at three months. These are not rare complications. This is the expected outcome for a significant portion of patients whose initial scans looked normal.
How TBI Occurs in Medical Settings
Traumatic brain injury can result from a range of failures in medical care. The most common include hospital and nursing facility falls, where providers fail to properly assess fall risk or implement appropriate precautions like bed alarms, supervision, or medication monitoring. Falls are especially dangerous for patients on blood thinners, where even a minor impact can cause life-threatening intracranial bleeding.
Medication-related falls are another frequent cause, particularly when sedatives, opioids, or blood pressure medications are prescribed without adequate monitoring or dosage adjustment for elderly patients.
Patient drops during transfers, repositioning, or physical therapy represent a distinct category where staff physically lose control of a patient. These cases range from bed-to-wheelchair transfers to newborns dropped during delivery.
TBI can also result from a failure to diagnose or a delay in treating complications like expanding hematomas or brain swelling. More than half of mild TBI cases that present to emergency departments go undiagnosed, often because a “normal” CT scan is treated as proof that no injury occurred.
Proving a Brain Injury: Diagnostic Advances
For decades, the gap between what TBI patients experienced and what doctors could objectively prove allowed brain injuries to go unrecognized. A normal CT scan was treated as evidence that no injury existed. That gap has narrowed significantly.
CT scans remain the first-line tool for identifying surgical emergencies like skull fractures and large hemorrhages, but they were never designed to detect the microscopic white matter damage that causes most TBI symptoms. Conventional MRI offers better resolution but still misses the majority of white matter injury in mild TBI cases.
Advanced imaging has changed the landscape. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures the integrity of nerve fiber connections and can reveal damage that CT and standard MRI cannot detect. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) detects microhemorrhages invisible on conventional scans. Volumetric MRI can track brain atrophy over time.
Blood-based biomarkers have also emerged as a diagnostic tool. The FDA has cleared tests that measure proteins released into the bloodstream when brain tissue is injured. These provide objective laboratory evidence that a brain injury occurred, independent of patient-reported symptoms.
Neuropsychological testing offers another layer of objective measurement. Standardized test batteries assess specific cognitive functions like memory, processing speed, and executive function. Built-in validity measures detect whether a patient is giving full effort, making it difficult to dismiss results as exaggerated.
In 2025, the NIH published the TBI Classification and Nomenclature Initiative, formally recognizing that no single measure, not a GCS score, a CT scan, or any other individual test, can adequately characterize a brain injury. The framework calls for an integrated approach using clinical assessment, imaging, biomarkers, and other factors together.
Building a Complete Picture
No single diagnostic tool tells the full story of a traumatic brain injury. The most complete understanding comes from combining multiple lines of evidence: advanced imaging showing structural damage, neuropsychological testing documenting cognitive deficits, clinical records establishing the mechanism and timeline, and testimony from family members, coworkers, and friends who can describe the real-world changes they have witnessed.
Recent research has also shown that TBI is not a one-time event with a fixed recovery timeline. Longitudinal studies published in 2025 found that certain biomarkers associated with brain injury remained elevated for nearly a decade after the initial trauma, suggesting that injury-related processes continue long after a patient may appear clinically recovered. The emerging understanding is that TBI is a chronic, evolving condition with long-term implications for health and quality of life.
