Texas Spinal Cord Injury From Surgery Lawyer

Surgical spinal cord damage can leave a person facing paralysis, loss of function, and long term medical complications after a procedure that was meant to help. These injuries can involve direct trauma, wrong level surgery, misplaced hardware, or delayed recognition of post operative compression or infection. Whether an outcome reflects an accepted risk or a preventable error often turns on the standard of care during surgery and recovery, including monitoring and timely response to new neurological symptoms. If you or a loved one were harmed or worse due to spinal cord injury from surgery in Texas, contact Hastings Law Firm for a free, confidential case review.

A medical professional examines a detailed spine model, reflecting the work of a Texas Surgical Spinal Cord Damage lawyer.

Trusted Texas Medical Attorneys for Surgical Spinal Cord Damage Claims

What You Should Know About Surgical Spinal Cord Damage Claims in Texas:

  • Long term disability can follow a surgical spinal cord injury, including paralysis, loss of function, and lasting limits on independence.
  • Recovery outcomes can worsen when post operative warning signs are not evaluated and treated promptly after spine surgery.
  • Liability can turn on whether the harm was a known surgical risk or a preventable deviation from the standard of care.
  • Severe impacts on breathing and the need for continuous attendant care can occur with higher level spinal cord damage.
  • Ongoing medical complications can drive lifelong care needs, including chronic pain, bowel and bladder dysfunction, and serious infections.
  • Compensation can be limited for non economic harms in Texas medical malpractice claims because state law caps those damages.
  • Financial recovery for measurable losses can be broader because Texas law does not cap economic damages such as medical expenses and lost wages.
  • The value of a claim can depend on documented severity classifications and objective records such as operative reports and imaging.
  • Options can be lost if filing deadlines are missed in Texas medical malpractice cases.
  • A claim can be dismissed if required expert support is not provided under Texas medical malpractice rules.
An interior view of the best medical malpractice law firm in Texas
FREE CASE EVALUATION 877-269-4620 NO FEE UNLESS WE WIN (HABLAMOS ESPAÑOL)

A Healthcare Focused Law Firm

A spinal cord injury caused by a surgical error changes everything in an instant. If you or a loved one is living with paralysis, nerve damage, or loss of function after a procedure that was supposed to help, the confusion and frustration you feel are completely valid. You trusted a medical team to protect you, and something went wrong. Now you need answers, and you need someone who understands both the medicine and the law well enough to find them.

Founded by Tommy Hastings, a board-certified trial lawyer, Hastings Law Firm is dedicated exclusively to medical malpractice. Our team includes in-house medical professionals and former defense attorneys who know how hospitals and insurers respond to these claims. If you are looking for a Texas spinal cord injury from surgery lawyer, we are ready to review your case, explain what happened, and help you understand your legal options in a free, confidential consultation.

Understanding Surgical Spinal Cord Injuries and Paralysis

A surgical spinal cord injury occurs when a surgeon, anesthesiologist, or medical staff member deviates from the standard of care during a procedure, resulting in damage to the spinal cord that causes partial or total paralysis. These injuries are sometimes called iatrogenic spinal cord injuries, meaning they are caused by the medical treatment itself rather than an underlying disease or accident.

Not every complication during surgery is malpractice. Spine procedures carry inherent risks, and patients are typically informed of those risks before consenting to surgery. The legal question is whether the injury resulted from a known, accepted risk or from a preventable error. When a surgical spinal cord injury lawyer reviews a case, we look at whether the medical team met the accepted standard of care throughout the entire procedure and recovery period.

Spinal cord damage during surgery can happen in several ways:

  • Direct instrument trauma: A scalpel, drill, or other surgical tool physically contacts the spinal cord or surrounding nerve roots.
  • Wrong-level spinal surgery: The surgeon operates on the incorrect vertebra, damaging healthy tissue and potentially the cord itself.
  • Misplaced hardware: Screws, rods, or plates used in spinal fusion are positioned incorrectly, compressing or severing nerve structures.
  • Compression from a spinal epidural hematoma: Bleeding near the spinal cord after surgery creates a blood clot that presses against the cord, cutting off function.
  • Spinal epidural abscess: A post-surgical infection creates a pocket of pus that compresses the cord.

One critical area we examine is whether intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), a real-time system that tracks nerve signals during surgery, was properly used. If monitoring detected a change in nerve function and the surgical team failed to respond, that can indicate a breach of the standard of care.

Spinal Epidural Hematoma and Abscess

Two of the most time-sensitive complications after spine surgery are spinal epidural hematoma, a collection of blood that forms near the spinal cord and compresses it, and spinal epidural abscess, a similar compression caused by an infected fluid pocket. Both conditions can develop in the hours or days following surgery. When caught early, surgical intervention to relieve the pressure can prevent permanent damage.

The standard of care generally requires close post-operative monitoring, including neurological assessments at regular intervals. Resources from MedlinePlus on spine surgery discharge outline the types of warning signs that medical teams should watch for after a procedure. If a patient reports new weakness, numbness, or loss of bladder control and the medical team delays evaluation or treatment, that delay may form the basis of a medical malpractice claim.

An attorney for spinal surgery errors will investigate the post-operative timeline closely to determine whether the response was adequate. A Texas surgical injury attorney experienced in these cases understands that hours, sometimes even minutes, can mean the difference between a recoverable complication and permanent paralysis.

Clinical diagram explaining how a Texas Spinal Cord Injury From Surgery Lawyer may link surgical trauma, wrong level surgery, epidural hematoma, or epidural abscess to paralysis through spinal cord compression and delayed postoperative monitoring.

Severity of Spinal Cord Damage and Types of Paralysis

The severity of a spinal cord injury is classified as either complete, resulting in total loss of function below the injury site, or incomplete, where some sensation or movement remains. This classification directly shapes the long-term prognosis, the level of care required, and the full value of a legal claim.

Where the injury occurs along the spine determines which parts of the body are affected. The spinal cord is divided into regions: cervical (neck), thoracic (mid-back), and lumbar (lower back). Damage higher on the cord affects more of the body. A cervical injury can result in quadriplegia, which is the loss of movement and sensation in all four limbs. Thoracic or lumbar injuries more commonly lead to paraplegia, affecting the legs and lower body.

The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) provide the medical framework clinicians use to evaluate these injuries. A spinal cord injury attorney relies on these same classifications when building a case, because the documented severity level directly supports the calculation of lifetime damages.

It is also important to distinguish between paralysis, which is the total loss of motor function, and paresis, a partial weakness that may still significantly limit a person’s ability to work, move independently, or care for themselves. While a patient with paresis might retain the ability to walk short distances, they often suffer from severe fatigue, spasticity, and coordination issues that make full-time employment or unassisted living impossible. Even an incomplete spinal cord injury, one where the patient retains some function, can be profoundly disabling and require extensive rehabilitation.

Complete InjuryIncomplete Injury
Motor FunctionNo voluntary movement below injurySome movement may be preserved
SensationNo feeling below injury levelPartial sensation may remain
Recovery PotentialLimited; permanent loss is commonVariable; some improvement possible
Quadriplegia (Cervical)Loss of all four limbs’ functionPartial arm or hand movement possible
Paraplegia (Thoracic/Lumbar)Full loss of lower body functionSome leg movement or sensation possible

High-level cervical injuries are among the most devastating. They can affect breathing, require ventilator dependence, and demand 24-hour attendant care. A lawyer for paralysis after surgery must account for every one of these realities when pursuing full complete compensation.

Comparison chart defining complete versus incomplete spinal cord injury and explaining paraplegia quadriplegia and paresis for readers seeking a Texas Spinal Cord Injury From Surgery Lawyer.

The Hastings Law Firm Difference

Results matter, but what truly sets us apart is how we achieve them. Every verdict, every settlement, and every Texas courtroom victory comes from one guiding promise: To treat each client’s fight for justice as if it were our own.

  • 20+ years of exclusive focus on healthcare litigation, allowing our entire practice to understand this complex field.
  • Board-certified trial leadership under Tommy Hastings, ensuring every case is approached with precision and integrity.
  • In-house medical professionals including nurse paralegals and certified patient advocates.
  • National network of medical experts who provide the specialized testimony needed to prove complex claims.
  • Proven multimillion-dollar verdicts and settlements that demonstrate meaningful outcomes.
  • Compassionate, client-centered representation that ensures each person feels respected and supported.

This balance of skill, experience, and empathy reflects our core philosophy that justice should not only compensate the injured, but also make healthcare safer nationwide.

Personal injury trial attorney Tommy Hastings in a suit standing outside of a courtroom before a medical litigation case starts.

Proving Medical Negligence in Surgical Spinal Cord Injury Cases

Proving negligence requires demonstrating that the surgeon or medical staff breached the accepted standard of care and that this breach directly caused the patient’s spinal cord damage. In Texas, this is not a matter of opinion; it is a structured legal analysis governed by Chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Establishing liability often involves dissecting the operative report to find discrepancies between what was documented and what the imaging reveals.

Every spinal cord injury lawsuit must establish four elements. If any one of these is missing, the claim cannot move forward:

  • Duty: The surgeon or medical provider owed the patient a duty of care. This is established automatically through the doctor-patient relationship.
  • Breach: The provider failed to meet the standard of care, which is the level of treatment a reasonably competent professional in the same specialty would have provided under similar circumstances. This analysis goes beyond a simple review, as it requires a granular look at the surgical technique used. For instance, if a surgeon chose a surgical approach that carried a higher risk of cord impingement when a safer alternative existed, that decision itself may constitute a breach.
  • Causation: The breach directly caused the spinal cord injury. The patient must show that the damage would not have occurred but for the provider’s error.
  • Damages: The patient suffered real, documented harm, including physical injuries, financial losses, and non-economic suffering.

A Texas medical malpractice lawyer investigates each of these elements by reconstructing the surgical timeline, reviewing operative reports, and analyzing imaging studies. Proving surgical negligence often centers on identifying a specific error, such as the surgeon nicking the spinal cord, operating on the wrong vertebral level, or misplacing hardware such as pedicle screws, which are the screws anchored into the vertebrae to stabilize the spine.

The standard of care is not a theoretical concept. It is defined by qualified medical experts who practice in the same specialty as the defendant. In a spinal cord injury lawsuit, we retain board-certified surgeons and other specialists to review every detail of what happened in the operating room and the recovery unit to determine if liability exists.

Wrong-Level Spine Surgery Risks

Wrong-level spinal surgery occurs when a surgeon operates on the incorrect vertebra, for example performing a procedure at L3 instead of L4. This is widely classified as a “never event,” meaning it should never happen when proper protocols are followed.

Pedicle screw malposition, where stabilization screws are placed outside the intended vertebral structure, is a related error that can compress nerves or penetrate the spinal canal. Preoperative imaging, surgical site verification, and intraoperative fluoroscopy are all standard safeguards designed to prevent these errors. When a Texas spinal cord injury from surgery lawyer examines a wrong-level case, we look at whether each of these protocols was followed, documented, and confirmed before the first incision.

Process flowchart showing how a Texas Spinal Cord Injury From Surgery Lawyer proves duty breach causation and damages using operative records imaging and expert testimony.

Life-Altering Consequences and Long-Term Medical Complications

Victims of surgical spinal cord injuries often face lifelong complications including chronic pain, loss of bowel and bladder control, and increased susceptibility to severe infections. The immediate injury is only the beginning. The secondary health consequences that develop over months and years can be equally devastating and require extensive, ongoing medical care.

The physical complications resulting from surgical nerve damage are wide-ranging:

  • Pressure sores (decubitus ulcers): Patients with limited mobility are at high risk for skin breakdown that can lead to deep tissue damage and life-threatening infections. Research published in JAMA Network Open on hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in cervical spinal cord injury patients documents the significant relationship between these wounds and long-term motor recovery outcomes.
  • Muscle atrophy: Without regular use, muscles below the injury level weaken and deteriorate, making rehabilitation more difficult over time.
  • Neurogenic bowel and bladder dysfunction: Damage to the spinal cord often disrupts the nerve signals that control the bladder and intestines, requiring catheterization, manual bowel programs, or both. This often involves strict schedules for catheterization or bowel management programs that can take hours each day, significantly impacting a patient’s independence and quality of life.
  • Respiratory complications: Cervical injuries can impair the muscles used for breathing, increasing the risk of pneumonia and requiring long-term respiratory support.
  • Chronic neuropathic pain: Many patients experience persistent burning, tingling, or shooting pain in areas below the injury, even when they have lost sensation to touch.
  • Thermoregulatory dysfunction: The body may lose its ability to regulate temperature properly, leading to dangerous overheating or hypothermia. Patients may need to stay in climate-controlled environments and avoid physical exertion that could raise their body temperature to dangerous levels, further limiting their ability to participate in outdoor activities or certain lines of work.
  • Cardiovascular risks: Reduced mobility and autonomic disruption increase the risk of blood clots, low blood pressure episodes, and heart disease.

Beyond the visible physical effects, there are injuries that are less obvious but no less real. Loss of sexual function affects relationships and self-image. Depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress are common among patients adjusting to permanent disability. The emotional toll of adjusting to life in a wheelchair, mourning the loss of previous abilities, and managing chronic pain often requires professional psychological support, which is another recoverable cost. A permanent nerve damage attorney understands that these “invisible” injuries carry real economic and non-economic value in a legal claim.

Building a case for long-term spinal injury care means documenting not just the injury itself, but every complication it has caused and will continue to cause. A lawyer for surgical complications works with medical experts and life care planners to project these needs across the patient’s remaining lifetime.

Compensation for Victims of Surgically Induced Paralysis in Texas

Compensation in Texas malpractice cases covers economic damages like medical bills and lost wages, as well as non-economic damages for pain and suffering, though the latter is subject to state caps. Securing full damages for surgical paralysis requires a thorough approach to valuation. Understanding how these categories work is essential to protecting the full value of a spinal cord injury claim.

Economic damages have no cap under Texas law. These are the measurable financial losses tied directly to the injury:

  • Past and future medical expenses, including surgeries, hospital stays, rehabilitation, medications, and assistive devices such as wheelchairs or home ventilators
  • Home modifications, such as wheelchair ramps, accessible bathrooms, and modified vehicles
  • Lost wages and lost earning capacity if the injury prevents the patient from returning to work or limits future employment
  • In-home nursing care or attendant services required on a daily basis

Because spinal cord injuries often require a lifetime of care, accurately calculating these costs is critical. Life care plans are essential for these calculations. A life care plan is a detailed projection created by medical and rehabilitation experts that estimates every future cost associated with the injury, from equipment replacement schedules to anticipated hospitalizations. It is not a simple list of medical bills; it is a dynamic document that accounts for inflation, potential medical complications, and the increasing cost of healthcare over decades. For a young patient of surgical paralysis, this plan must project costs for fifty years or more, including details such as the replacement frequency of power wheelchairs and the price of routine supplies like catheters.

Non-economic damages compensate for the human toll of the injury:

  • Physical pain and suffering
  • Mental anguish and emotional distress
  • Loss of enjoyment of life
  • Disfigurement
  • Loss of consortium, which is the impact on the relationship between the injured person and their spouse

Texas law caps non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases at $250,000 against all physicians and individual health care providers combined and $250,000 per health care institution (with a maximum of $500,000 across all institutions), for an overall combined cap of $750,000. Because of these caps, accurately documenting and maximizing economic damages becomes even more important. Vocational experts assess how the injury has affected the patient’s ability to earn income, while economists project those losses over a full working lifetime. Vocational experts do more than just look at pay stubs; they evaluate the patient’s education, skills, and physical limitations to determine if any work is possible, and if so, how much earning power has been lost compared to their pre-injury trajectory.

A compensation for spinal injury claim is only as strong as the evidence supporting it. Every dollar of past treatment, every future medical need, and every lost opportunity must be documented, calculated, and presented clearly. A Texas spinal cord injury settlement reflects the quality of that preparation.

How Hastings Law Firm Investigates Surgical Spinal Cord Injuries

Hastings Law Firm employs a “Trial-Ready” approach, using in-house medical staff and former defense attorneys to thoroughly investigate surgical errors and secure expert testimony from day one. This level of preparation builds stronger cases and creates real leverage during settlement negotiations, because the defense knows we are fully prepared to go to trial.

Our team includes in-house nurse practitioners and Board Certified Patient Advocates who begin reviewing medical records as soon as a case is accepted. They analyze operative reports, nursing notes, imaging studies, and monitoring data to build a detailed timeline of what happened before, during, and after the procedure. Our investigation often uncovers details that a standard review might miss. We look for discrepancies between nursing notes and surgeon reports, gaps in neuromonitoring logs, and failure to document vital sign changes in the recovery room.

By constructing a minute-by-minute timeline of the event, we can pinpoint exactly when the standard of care was breached and how the medical team failed to intervene. Patients in Texas have the right to access their own medical records, a process outlined by the Texas Medical Board, and we help our clients obtain those records as part of the initial investigation.

What sets our approach apart is insider insight. Our legal team includes former defense attorneys who previously represented hospitals and medical providers. They understand the strategies the other side will use, from questioning causation to minimizing the severity of the injury. This experience allows us to see the case through the lens of the defense. We know how they evaluate risk, how they calculate settlement offers, and the tactics they use to delay or deny claims. By anticipating these moves, we can proactively block them, ensuring that your claim moves forward efficiently and that the evidence we present addresses their potential counterarguments before they are even made.

We also maintain a national network of top-tier medical experts across every surgical specialty. These are practicing physicians who can objectively evaluate whether the standard of care was met and, if it was not, provide credible testimony explaining exactly how the error caused the injury. As a Texas spinal cord injury from surgery lawyer, we understand that expert testimony often determines the outcome of these cases, so we invest heavily in identifying the right experts early.

Our firm handles these cases on a contingency fee basis. You pay no attorney fees and no upfront costs. We only collect a fee if we secure a recovery for you. This structure exists because we believe that access to justice should not depend on whether someone can afford to hire a spinal cord injury attorney out of pocket, especially when they are already facing overwhelming medical expenses.

Contact the Texas Surgical Error Attorneys at Hastings Law Firm Today for Help

If you or a loved one suffered paralysis or nerve damage after a surgical procedure, you deserve to know what happened and whether it could have been prevented. The medical records hold answers, and our team has the medical and legal experience to find them.

Hastings Law Firm offers a free, confidential case evaluation with no obligation. Our board-certified attorneys and in-house medical staff will review your records, explain your options, and help you understand whether you have a viable claim. As a Texas spinal cord injury from surgery lawyer, we are here to provide clarity during an overwhelming time.

Contact us today. There is no fee unless we win.

Frequently Asked Questions About Spinal Cord Injury From Surgery in Texas

Texas places a cap on non-economic damages (pain and suffering) at $250,000 against all physicians and individual health care providers combined and a separate $250,000 per health care institution (with a maximum of $500,000 across all institutions), with an overall cap of $750,000. However, there is no cap on economic damages, such as past and future medical expenses or lost wages. Our attorneys use vocational experts and life care planners to maximize these uncapped economic damages. These caps are established under the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Chapter 74.

The statute of limitations for medical malpractice in Texas is generally two years from the occurrence of the breach or tort, or from the date the medical treatment at issue is completed. Texas also enforces a strict ten-year statute of repose, meaning no claim may be brought more than ten years after the negligent act, regardless of when the injury is discovered. You should consult a Texas spinal cord injury from surgery lawyer immediately to protect your rights.

Yes. Under Chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Section 74.351, a patient must serve an expert report within 120 days after the date each defendant’s original answer is filed. This report must detail the applicable standard of care, how the surgeon breached it, and how that breach caused the spinal cord injury. Failure to provide this report results in case dismissal.

Yes. Signing an informed consent form acknowledges known risks, but it does not grant the surgeon permission to be negligent. If the injury resulted from a deviation from the standard of care, such as a wrong-level spinal surgery or leaving an instrument inside the body, the consent form does not protect the doctor from liability.

While any back surgery carries risk, procedures like laminectomies, spinal fusions, and discectomies see higher rates of nerve damage claims. Errors often involve misplaced hardware (screws), failure to recognize a spinal epidural hematoma, or direct trauma to the cord during the procedure.

It depends. Hospitals are often liable for the negligence of their direct employees, such as nurses or technicians. However, many surgeons are independent contractors. You may still have a claim against the hospital for credentialing errors or inadequate staffing if those factors contributed to your paralysis or injury.

A group photo of the staff at Hastings Law Firm Medical Malpractice Lawyers
Have a Question? Our Team of Board Certified Patient Advocates, Nurse Paralegals, and Experienced Trial Attorneys are Here to Answer Your Questions.

Key Spinal Cord Injury From Surgery Terms:

Iatrogenic spinal cord injury
An injury to the spinal cord caused by medical treatment or a surgical procedure, rather than by disease or accident. In the context of spine surgery, this occurs when a surgeon’s actions—such as using instruments that directly damage the cord, placing hardware incorrectly, or failing to address complications like bleeding—result in harm to the spinal cord. These injuries can lead to paralysis or loss of sensation and may be the basis for a medical malpractice claim if they result from negligence rather than an unavoidable surgical risk.
Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM)
A technique used during surgery to monitor the nervous system in real time, including the spinal cord and nerves, to detect potential injury before it becomes permanent. Electrodes measure electrical signals from the spinal cord and nerves while the surgeon operates. If the monitoring shows a problem, the surgical team can take immediate corrective action. Failure to use neuromonitoring when it is standard practice, or ignoring warning signals from the monitoring equipment, may constitute negligence in a spinal surgery malpractice case.
Spinal epidural hematoma
A collection of blood that forms in the space between the protective covering of the spinal cord and the bones of the spine (the epidural space). This can occur after spinal surgery due to bleeding from blood vessels. If the hematoma grows, it compresses the spinal cord and can cause paralysis or permanent nerve damage. Quick diagnosis and emergency surgery to remove the blood clot are critical. Delayed recognition or treatment of a spinal epidural hematoma is a common basis for medical malpractice claims involving post-operative spinal cord injuries.
Spinal epidural abscess
A rare but serious infection in the space between the spinal cord’s protective covering and the spinal bones (the epidural space). It can develop after spinal surgery if bacteria enter the surgical site. As the abscess grows, it puts pressure on the spinal cord, leading to severe back pain, fever, weakness, and potentially paralysis if untreated. Prompt diagnosis through imaging and treatment with antibiotics or surgical drainage are essential. Failure to recognize the signs of infection or delay in treatment can result in permanent spinal cord damage and may be grounds for a malpractice claim.
Complete spinal cord injury
A spinal cord injury in which there is a total loss of sensory and motor function below the level of the injury. This means the person cannot feel anything or move any muscles in the affected areas of the body. Complete injuries typically result in permanent paralysis, such as paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body) or quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs and the torso). In a medical malpractice case, a complete spinal cord injury represents the most severe category of damage and significantly impacts the compensation claim due to lifelong disability and care needs.
Incomplete spinal cord injury
A spinal cord injury in which some sensory or motor function remains below the level of the injury. The person may retain some ability to move or feel in the affected areas, though function is impaired. The severity of an incomplete injury varies widely—some individuals may walk with assistance, while others may have only minimal sensation. Incomplete injuries offer more potential for recovery compared to complete injuries, but they still result in significant disability and medical needs. In a malpractice case, the extent of remaining function affects the calculation of damages and future care requirements.
Wrong-level spinal surgery
A surgical error in which the surgeon operates on the incorrect vertebra or disc in the spine. For example, removing a disc at L4-L5 instead of the intended L5-S1 level. This is considered a “never event”—a serious, preventable mistake that should never occur with proper protocols. Wrong-level surgery can leave the patient’s original problem unresolved, require additional corrective surgery, and sometimes cause new spinal cord or nerve injuries. It is a clear breach of the standard of care and a strong basis for a medical malpractice claim.
Pedicle screw malposition
A complication in spinal fusion surgery where screws inserted into the pedicles (small bony projections on the vertebrae) are placed incorrectly. If a screw is angled wrong or drilled too deep, it can penetrate into the spinal canal and damage the spinal cord or nerve roots, causing pain, weakness, or paralysis. While some screw malposition may be an accepted risk, cases where the surgeon fails to use proper imaging, neuromonitoring, or technique—or fails to recognize and correct the problem—may constitute negligence in a malpractice claim.
Pressure sores (decubitus ulcers)
Wounds that develop on the skin and underlying tissue due to prolonged pressure, often occurring in individuals with paralysis or limited mobility who cannot change positions on their own. Also known as bedsores, these ulcers commonly form on bony areas like the tailbone, hips, and heels. Pressure sores can become infected, extend deep into muscle and bone, and require extensive treatment including surgery. They are a serious long-term complication of spinal cord injury and represent a significant component of future medical costs and quality-of-life damages in a malpractice case.
Neurogenic bowel and bladder dysfunction
Loss of normal control over bowel and bladder function due to nerve damage from a spinal cord injury. Individuals with this condition cannot sense when their bladder or bowels are full and may be unable to voluntarily control urination or defecation. Management typically requires catheterization, bowel programs, and sometimes surgery. Neurogenic bowel and bladder dysfunction significantly affects daily life, dignity, and independence, and increases the risk of infections and other complications. These challenges are factored into both economic and non-economic damages in a spinal cord injury malpractice claim.

Get Answers Today

If you think that medical negligence, a dangerous drug, or a failed medical product caused harm to you or someone you love, our team is standing by to offer guidance. We’ll explain your options under current laws and help you move forward with clarity and understanding. Case reviews are free and 100% confidential.