Arizona Spine Surgeon Malpractice Lawyer
Written by: Hastings Law Firm | Reviewed by: Tommy Hastings | Updated: May 6, 2026
Back and spine surgeries such as spinal fusion and laminectomy carry known risks even when performed correctly. When a preventable mistake occurs during planning, the operation, or recovery, the harm can be severe and may reflect medical malpractice. Common concerns include wrong level surgery, misplaced hardware, missed nerve monitoring, and delayed response to post surgical complications, which can leave lasting pain, nerve injury, disability, or worse. If you or a loved one were harmed or worse due to spine surgery malpractice in Arizona, contact Hastings Law Firm for a free, confidential case review.

Top Rated Back Surgery Negligence Attorneys in Arizona
What You Should Know About Negligent Back Surgery Claims in Arizona:
- Lasting disability or paralysis can follow a preventable spine surgery error because small mistakes can injure dense nerve structures.
- A malpractice claim can turn on whether the surgeon deviated from the accepted standard of care and caused a new injury or worsened condition.
- Liability disputes can arise when informed consent was inadequate, including when serious risks like paralysis were not properly disclosed.
- Recovery can include economic damages and non economic damages when a surgical error causes added medical costs, lost wages, and reduced quality of life.
- Punitive damages may be possible only in rare situations involving intentional misconduct or conscious disregard for patient safety.
- Legal options can be lost if filing deadlines are missed, with shorter time limits applying to claims involving public or state run hospitals in Arizona.
- Expert review can be central in back surgery cases because qualified surgeons often must assess whether standard of care violations occurred.
- Medical records can be pivotal when documentation is incomplete, including missing notes about intraoperative monitoring or an undocumented dural tear and CSF leak.

A Healthcare Focused Law Firm
Procedures like spinal fusion, where two or more vertebrae are permanently joined to stabilize the spine, carry real risks. These risks also apply to laminectomy, the removal of part of a vertebra to relieve pressure on the spinal cord, even under ideal conditions. But when those risks are caused by a surgeon’s preventable mistake rather than a known complication, that is not just a bad outcome. It may be medical malpractice.
If you or a loved one suffered a serious injury after back or spine surgery in Arizona, an experienced Arizona spine surgeon malpractice lawyer can help you understand what went wrong and whether negligence played a role. At Hastings Law Firm, our team of attorneys, nurse consultants, and medical experts focuses exclusively on medical malpractice cases. Contact us for a free, confidential case evaluation to learn about your options.
Common Errors in Spinal Fusion and Laminectomy Surgeries
Surgical errors in spine procedures often involve operating on the wrong vertebral level, misplaced hardware impinging on nerves, or failure to monitor spinal cord function during the operation. These surgeries require high precision to protect the delicate nervous system. Because the spinal column houses such a dense concentration of nerves, even a small mistake during surgery can lead to permanent disability.
Spine procedures like discectomy and multi-level fusion are technically demanding. When preparation is inadequate or attention to detail lapses, the results of spine surgery malpractice can be devastating.
Some of the most serious errors include:
- Wrong-level surgery: Operating on the incorrect vertebral segment. This wrong-site surgery is classified as a “never event,” a term defined by the National Quality Forum (NQF) Patient Safety Terms and Definitions to describe errors so serious they should never occur.
- Pedicle screw malposition (misplaced hardware): Screws placed outside the intended bone path can compress nerves, leading to paralysis.
- Retained foreign objects: Sponges or instruments left inside the body.
- Dural tears and spinal cord injury: Accidental puncture of the membrane surrounding the spinal cord.
- Failure to use intraoperative monitoring: Neglecting real-time nerve monitoring can allow a back surgery error to go undetected.
The Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, Wrong Person Surgery exists to prevent these mistakes. When a negligent spinal surgeon skips these steps, patients pay the price. An Arizona spine injury attorney can help determine whether surgical negligence was the cause.
Hidden Dangers of Surgical Errors Occurring Outside the Operating Room
Negligence isn’t limited to the incision. These medical errors can occur during any phase of treatment, from initial planning to recovery. Pre-operative planning failures, like misreading imaging, can lead to a wrong procedure or inadequate preparation. Medical teams must monitor patient progress both before and after the operation to ensure safety.
Post-operative care carries risks. A surgical site infection (SSI), an infection that develops at or near the incision after surgery, must be treated promptly.
A postoperative epidural hematoma, a collection of blood pressing against the spinal cord, requires urgent intervention. When staff delay corrective medical care, a treatable complication can become permanent. The standard of care requires monitoring for these conditions.

Proving Negligence Against Arizona Spine Surgeons
To prove spine surgeon liability, a patient must demonstrate that the surgeon deviated from the accepted medical standard of care and that this deviation directly caused new injury or worsened the existing condition.
The standard of care refers to the level of treatment that a reasonably competent orthopedic or neurosurgeon would provide under similar circumstances. Proving surgeon negligence in these cases almost always requires an expert witness for back surgery. These are qualified surgeons who review records to determine if standard of care violations occurred.
One issue that frequently arises is informed consent. If the surgeon failed to adequately disclose risks like paralysis, the consent may be insufficient. Our medical malpractice lawyer works with in-house nurse consultants to reconstruct the event. We examine if protocols, such as those from JCAHO, were followed.
We also check intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), which tracks nerve function in real time during surgery, and post-operative notes. When a dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, a breach in the membrane protecting the spinal cord, goes undocumented, it can be evidence of spine surgeon liability.

The Hastings Law Firm Difference
Results matter, but what truly sets us apart is how we achieve them. Every verdict, every settlement, and every Arizona courtroom victory comes from one guiding promise: To treat each client’s fight for justice as if it were our own.
This balance of skill, experience, and empathy reflects our core philosophy that justice should not only compensate the injured, but also make healthcare safer nationwide.

Damages You Can Recover for Failed Back Surgery
Patients harmed by spine surgery malpractice can recover economic damages for medical bills and lost wages, as well as non-economic damages for pain, suffering, and loss of quality of life.
Legal damages help address financial losses and the personal impact of a surgical error. Suing a spine doctor allows patients to seek compensation for nerve damage or even brain damage caused by anesthesia errors. Injuries often require revision surgery, a second procedure to correct problems caused by the first.
Some patients develop cauda equina syndrome, a serious condition where compressed nerves at the base of the spinal cord cause bladder dysfunction. The National Library of Medicine on the prevalence and economic burden of spinal deformity underscores the high costs of these conditions.
Damages in Arizona follow the framework of Arizona Revised Statutes Title 12. A fair spine injury settlement covers:
| Damages Category | What It Covers |
|---|---|
| Economic Damages | Past and future medical expenses, revision surgeries, rehabilitation, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, in-home care needs |
| Non-Economic Damages | Pain and suffering, emotional distress, PTSD, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of mobility or independence |
| Punitive Damages | Available only when the surgeon’s conduct reflects an “evil hand guided by an evil mind,” meaning the defendant acted with intentional misconduct or conscious disregard for the patient’s safety |
Punitive damages are rare, but they can apply when the evidence shows extreme indifference.

Arizona Statute of Limitations for Spine Injury Claims
In Arizona, medical malpractice claims must generally be filed within two years of the date the injury occurred or was discovered, though strict exceptions apply.
The discovery rule is important here. Symptoms of hardware failure may not appear immediately. The clock starts when the injury is discovered. However, the statute of limitations in Arizona has strict limits. Filing a spine injury claim on time is essential.
If your claim involves a public or state-run hospital, shorter deadlines apply:
- Claims against public entities require a formal Notice of Claim filed within 180 days of the injury.
- Failing to meet this time limit to sue surgeons can eliminate your right to file a lawsuit before the medical malpractice deadline expires.
Because these filing windows are strict, speaking with an attorney immediately is the safest course of action.
Contact the Arizona Surgical Error Attorneys at Hastings Law Firm Today for Help
You should not have to pay the price for a surgeon’s mistake. If a spine procedure left you or someone you love with new pain, nerve damage, paralysis, or the need for additional surgeries, you deserve honest answers about what happened and why.
Founded by board-certified trial attorney Tommy Hastings, our firm focuses exclusively on medical malpractice litigation. Hastings Law Firm represents spine surgery patients across Arizona from our Phoenix office.
Our legal team includes former defense attorneys and experienced hospital nurses who previously worked for the systems they now challenge. This background helps us interpret your surgical records and understand how hospitals respond to these claims. We prepare every case as though it is going to trial, because that preparation is what drives fair outcomes.
There is no fee unless we recover compensation for you. A Phoenix spine malpractice attorney at our firm can review your medical records, consult with qualified surgical experts, and give you a clear picture of your legal options.
Call us or request your free, confidential case evaluation today. Let us help you find the answers you deserve.
Frequently Asked Questions About Spine Surgeon Malpractice in Arizona

Key Spine Surgeon Malpractice Terms:
- Spinal fusion
- A surgical procedure that permanently joins two or more vertebrae in the spine using bone grafts, metal rods, screws, or plates to eliminate motion between them. This procedure is used to treat conditions like degenerative disc disease, spinal instability, or fractures. In malpractice cases, errors during spinal fusion—such as placing hardware incorrectly or operating on the wrong level—can cause permanent nerve damage, chronic pain, or paralysis.
- Laminectomy
- A surgical procedure that removes part of the vertebral bone called the lamina to relieve pressure on the spinal cord or nerves. It is commonly performed to treat spinal stenosis or herniated discs. In malpractice claims, complications from laminectomy—such as nerve injury, excessive bone removal, or failure to address the correct spinal level—can result in worsened symptoms or new neurological deficits.
- Wrong-level surgery
- A preventable surgical error where a surgeon operates on the incorrect vertebra or spinal level, such as fusing L3-L4 instead of the intended L4-L5. This is considered a ‘never event’ in healthcare—a serious mistake that should not occur with proper protocols. Wrong-level surgery often requires additional corrective operations and can leave patients with ongoing pain, limited mobility, and nerve damage.
- Pedicle screw malposition (misplaced hardware)
- A complication that occurs when screws used to stabilize the spine during fusion surgery are placed incorrectly, potentially penetrating the spinal canal or contacting nerve roots. Misplaced hardware can cause severe nerve damage, weakness, loss of sensation, or paralysis. In malpractice cases, this error may indicate a failure to use proper imaging, intraoperative monitoring, or surgical technique.
- Surgical site infection (SSI)
- An infection that occurs at or near the surgical incision after an operation, which can range from superficial skin infections to deep infections affecting the spine, hardware, or surrounding tissues. In spine surgery cases, SSIs can develop due to poor sterilization, contaminated instruments, or inadequate postoperative monitoring. These infections may require prolonged antibiotic treatment, additional surgeries to remove infected hardware, and can lead to serious complications like sepsis or chronic pain.
- Postoperative epidural hematoma
- A collection of blood that forms in the epidural space surrounding the spinal cord after surgery, which can compress the spinal cord or nerves. This complication requires urgent diagnosis and often emergency surgery to prevent permanent neurological damage, including paralysis or loss of bowel and bladder control. In malpractice claims, failure to recognize warning signs—such as sudden severe back pain, weakness, or numbness—or delays in performing decompression surgery may constitute negligence.
- Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM)
- A technique used during spine surgery to continuously monitor the electrical activity of the spinal cord and nerves in real time, helping surgeons detect potential nerve injury before permanent damage occurs. IONM provides alerts when nerve function changes, allowing the surgeon to adjust their approach. In malpractice cases, failure to use neuromonitoring when appropriate, or ignoring alerts from the monitoring system, can be evidence of substandard care if nerve injury results.
- Dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak
- A dural tear is an accidental puncture or rip in the dura mater, the protective membrane surrounding the spinal cord and nerves, which allows cerebrospinal fluid to leak out. While small tears can occur even with proper technique, failure to recognize and repair the tear during surgery—or inadequate postoperative management—can lead to severe headaches, infection (meningitis), or persistent fluid leakage requiring additional surgery. In malpractice claims, the focus is often on whether the tear was promptly identified and properly treated.
- Revision surgery
- A follow-up surgical procedure performed to correct problems from a previous spine operation, such as hardware failure, continued nerve compression, infection, or wrong-level surgery. Revision surgeries are typically more complex, carry higher risks, and involve longer recovery times than the initial operation. In medical malpractice cases, the need for revision surgery—and its associated costs, pain, and disability—is often a significant component of the economic and non-economic damages claimed by the patient.
- Cauda equina syndrome
- A rare but serious condition caused by severe compression of the bundle of nerve roots at the lower end of the spinal cord, which can result in loss of bowel and bladder control, sexual dysfunction, severe leg weakness, and saddle anesthesia (numbness in the inner thighs and buttocks). Cauda equina syndrome is a surgical emergency requiring immediate decompression surgery to prevent permanent disability. In malpractice cases, delays in diagnosis or treatment, or surgical errors that cause or worsen the condition, can lead to devastating, irreversible outcomes.
- NQF Patient Safety Terms and Definitions | UTHSC
- Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site Wrong Procedure Wrong Person Surgery | PSNet
- Prevalence & Economic Burden of Adult Spinal Deformity in a Large United States Commercial Payer Population | PubMed Central
- Arizona Revised Statutes Title 12 Courts and Civil Proceedings | Arizona Legislature

This content was researched and written by the Hastings Law Firm editorial team, which includes attorneys, medical professionals, and experienced researchers. Our writing is informed by internal knowledge and practical experience, and we cross-check critical details against authoritative sources cited throughout. Every piece undergoes human-led fact-checking and legal review. Because legal and medical information can change, if you spot an error, please contact us. Learn more about our content standards and review process on our editorial policy page.

Tommy Hastings, founder of Hastings Law Firm, is a board-certified personal injury trial lawyer dedicated exclusively to healthcare injury cases. Since 2001, he has represented injured patients and families in litigation against major hospital systems, pharmaceutical companies, and negligent healthcare providers nationwide. He has handled numerous high-profile cases that have drawn national media attention and resulted in multi-million dollar recoveries. He draws on that experience in his writing, helping readers understand how these cases work and what options may be available to them.
Get Answers Today
If you think that medical negligence, a dangerous drug, or a failed medical product caused harm to you or someone you love, our team is standing by to offer guidance. We’ll explain your options under current laws and help you move forward with clarity and understanding. Case reviews are free and 100% confidential.
